Cervical spineMinimally invasive surgery

Revision of failed cervical fusion (cervical pseudarthrosis)

Revision of a failed cervical fusion is indicated when previous cervical surgery, usually an ACDF, has not achieved bony fusion (pseudarthrosis) and pain persists, hardware loosens or new neurological symptoms appear. We understand how disheartening it is when surgery has not solved the pain and how unsettling it feels to consider a second operation. Our role is to offer a careful second-opinion assessment, reviewing your previous reports, current imaging and clinical course. This guide summarises when revision should be considered, the available technical options and what to expect from the cervical salvage process.

Spine neurosurgeon in Alicante and Benidorm
More than 20 years of experience in Neurosurgery (since 2003)
Vithas Medimar Hospital Alicante and Hospital Clínica Benidorm
Illustration of cervical revision surgery with posterior reinforcement after a failed anterior fusion and pseudarthrosis.

What is the revision of a failed cervical fusion?

Revision of a failed cervical fusion is a salvage operation aimed at treating a previous cervical fusion that has not consolidated. When bone fails to bridge the operated segment the condition is called pseudarthrosis. The treated level remains abnormally mobile, pain returns or never fully resolves and, in some cases, the screws or interbody cage become loose.

This is a familiar scenario for our team. Dr. Ben Ghezala has authored dedicated chapters on pseudarthrosis in reference German textbooks such as Spinale Neurochirurgie (Schattauer, 2009) and Wirbelsäule Interdisziplinär (Schattauer/Thieme, 2017), which guides planning when a first surgery has not met its goals.

The strategy depends on each case. In some patients the answer is to reinforce the fusion through a posterior approach, with posterior cervical fusion and lateral mass or pedicle screw instrumentation. In others, it is preferable to re-operate from the front, revising the previous anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), removing the plate, extending the decompression and placing a new graft. When poor bone quality, multiple levels or kyphosis coexist, combined anterior plus posterior approaches are considered.

To review your case, you can request a second opinion with Dr. Ben Ghezala.

Symptoms and signs of a failed cervical fusion

After a cervical fusion, certain signs should raise suspicion of pseudarthrosis or hardware failure:

Persistent neck pain or pain that returns after an initial improvement
Radiating shoulder or arm pain that reappears
Clicking, crepitus or a sense of abnormal motion in the neck
Pain worsening with movements or postures that used to be tolerable
Long-lasting swallowing difficulty or voice changes
Warning signs: progressive weakness, gait instability or bowel or bladder changes

When is revision surgery indicated?

Cervical pseudarthrosis confirmed on fine-cut CT (no bridging bone) or on dynamic flexion-extension X-rays showing persistent segmental motion
Loosening or migration of the plate, screws or interbody cage
Persistent mechanical neck pain beyond 6–12 months after surgery, once other causes have been ruled out
Recurrence or progression of radicular or myelopathic symptoms
Kyphosis or loss of height at the treated segment
Selected cases of accelerated adjacent-segment disease requiring extension of the fusion

How is the procedure performed?

1.Preoperative preparation

Preparation includes a complete review of the previous surgery: operative report, implant type, recovery and prior tests. Fine-cut cervical CT, MRI and flexion-extension X-rays are usually requested. Bone quality, hardware status and the presence of kyphosis are assessed. Medication is adjusted, postoperative analgesia is planned and the chosen strategy and alternatives are explained in detail.

2.During the procedure

The procedure is performed under general anaesthesia with neurophysiological monitoring. If a posterior salvage is chosen, the back of the neck is exposed, lateral masses and pedicles are identified and screws and rods are placed to stabilise the segment; bone graft is usually added and, in selected cases, biologics are used to promote fusion.

In an anterior revision, the previous plate and implant are carefully removed, decompression is completed and a new graft or cage is placed, with an updated plate. When kyphosis or several affected levels coexist, a combined anterior and posterior approach in one or two surgical sessions may be considered depending on the case.

3.Immediate postoperative period

After surgery the patient spends a short time in the recovery area before returning to the ward. Pain is controlled, a postoperative X-ray or CT is obtained and progressive mobilisation begins, usually with a soft collar during the first weeks. Hospital stay is typically 2–4 days, slightly longer than in primary surgery, depending on the complexity of the salvage and the clinical course.

Recovery after cervical revision surgery

Recovery after a revision is somewhat slower than after primary surgery. Daily activities are gradually resumed within a few days. Office work usually restarts between 4 and 6 weeks; physical jobs require more time and an individual assessment.

Bony fusion takes several months to consolidate. Heavy strain, impact sports and prolonged postures are avoided during the first three months. Guided rehabilitation, good ergonomics and clinical-radiological follow-up are key to achieving a stable fusion. Fever, severe pain, breathing difficulty or new neurological symptoms warrant prompt medical review.

Risks and possible complications

Any surgery carries general risks such as infection, bleeding, thrombosis or anaesthesia-related complications. Cervical revision surgery adds extra risk due to scar tissue, the presence of previous implants and the anatomy modified by the first operation.

Specific risks include nerve root or spinal cord injury, oesophageal or tracheal injury in anterior revisions (uncommon but more likely than in primary surgery), temporary swallowing difficulty or voice changes, vascular injury, persistent pseudarthrosis requiring further salvage and accelerated adjacent-segment degeneration. Each patient receives an individualised assessment to minimise these risks.

Frequently asked questions

Several factors can be involved: smoking, poor bone quality, diabetes, surgical technique, number of levels treated or issues with the graft and implant. In consultation we review each factor with your imaging to understand why fusion was not achieved.
You may be a candidate if pseudarthrosis is confirmed on imaging, the hardware is loose or you have persistent mechanical or neurological symptoms after other causes have been ruled out. The final decision is made after reviewing imaging, clinical course and expectations during a second-opinion assessment.
Not always. In many selected cases it is possible to reinforce the fusion through a posterior approach without touching the anterior plate, which reduces risks. In others it is advisable to remove it and revise the entire segment from the front. The choice depends on hardware condition, kyphosis and symptoms.
Yes. We offer a second-opinion assessment with no obligation to be operated on by us. If the conclusion is that revision is not appropriate, we explain it clearly and propose conservative or follow-up alternatives.
Fusion usually takes between three and six months to show clear bridging bone on CT, although it may take longer. Serial imaging is performed and physical activity is adjusted according to each patient's progress.
Ideally the previous operative report, the most recent MRI, a fine-cut CT of the operated segment and, if available, flexion-extension X-rays and follow-up reports. The more information you bring, the more precise the second opinion will be.

Do these symptoms sound familiar?

If you recognise yourself in some of these symptoms and your pain is starting to limit your daily life, we can review your case in a personalised consultation. Dr. Ben Ghezala will assess your clinical history and imaging studies to help you decide the best treatment option for you.

Request a consultation with Dr. Ben Ghezala